By Angela Morris | January 13, 2020
Houston attorney Jim Adler's lawsuits claimed that other lawyers and law firms committed trademark infringement on his well-known nickname, "The Texas Hammer," in mobile-device keyword search advertisements.
By Melanie Dubis, Catherine Lawson and Sloan Carpenter | January 8, 2020
Can the combination of a generic word and a generic website ending like ".com" create something distinctive enough to be trademarked? When does a large company's attempt to reduce confusion with a smaller business' slogan actually result in more confusion?
By Scott Graham | January 3, 2020
Haynes and Boone helped the gaming giant shut down unauthorized sales of Super Smash Brothers Ultimate and many other titles.
By Charles Toutant | December 31, 2019
Gray-market equipment reseller Radwell International seeks a "death knell" for the material differences doctrine, based on the U.S. Supreme Court's "Lexmark" ruling, but the court said material differences jurisprudence remains alive and well after "Lexmark."
By Craig R. Tractenberg | December 27, 2019
Brands are identified by their trademarks. Selecting the right mark, developing it and protecting it becomes essential when the brand is being developed. But trademarks can be lost when the company fails to protect it, or even when the name is so popular that use of the mark cannot be controlled.
Delaware Business Court Insider
By Craig R. Tractenberg | December 27, 2019
Brands are identified by their trademarks. Selecting the right mark, developing it and protecting it becomes essential when the brand is being developed. But trademarks can be lost when the company fails to protect it, or even when the name is so popular that use of the mark cannot be controlled.
By Alaina Lancaster | December 17, 2019
San Francisco-based Emergent Law asserts that "there is no likelihood of confusion" between it and South Carolina-based Emergent Law because of their differing geographic markets and client bases.
By Suzette Parmley | December 9, 2019
The Third Circuit upheld a ruling that a settlement between the DeLorean Motor Co. and its founder's estate precluded a suit seeking back royalties from products using the company's images and logo, such as the hit move "Back to the Future."
By Suzette Parmley | December 9, 2019
The Third Circuit upheld a ruling that a settlement between the DeLorean Motor Co. and its founder's estate precluded a suit seeking back royalties from products using the company's images and logo, such as the hit move "Back to the Future."
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller and Leigh Ann Benson | December 5, 2019
Two competing apparel companies find themselves before the U.S. Supreme Court after an 18-year trademark dispute. They are asking the court to consider the scope of the doctrine of res judicata, which precludes re-litigation of issues and claims that were, or could have been, litigated in a prior case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...