Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Trial court correctly found that insurer owed no duty to defend car driver because automobile insurance policy contained an unlisted resident driver exclusion and driver was policyholders live-in girlfriend, was not related to him.
Petitioner political party failed to establish that the anti-fusion provisions of the election code were unconstitutional because the Magazzu Loophole did not create a major party exemption from the ban on any political organization nominating a candidate of another political organization.
While plaintiffs mortgage foreclosure complaint was not deficient for failing to attach documentation of proper notices to defendants, the original promissory note or the banks merger with the original lender, the pleading verification did not comply with Rule 1024 since it failed to indicate whether the signer was an authorized officer of the bank.
The gist of the action doctrine precluded several tort claims against a contractor where the parties had a written contract for the removal of asbestos tiles and replacement of the roof, but tort claims for fraudulent inducement and negligence based on violation of a societal duty were not barred by that doctrine.
In this case of first impression, the court held that petitioner, a document requester seeking to enforce a disclosure order issued under the Right-to-Know Law, could not enforce the order while it was being considered on appeal. The court sustained respondents preliminary objections in the nature of demurrer and dismissed the mandamus petition with prejudice.
The court granted counsels petition to withdraw because counsels no-merit letter met the technical requirements of Turner/Finley and convicted parole violators claims that the board did not have the authority to alter his judicially-imposed sentence beyond his original maximum term.
Trial court erred in holding that the compromise and release of appellants workers compensation claim barred his FMLA and common law claims because the ordinary meaning and structure of the C&R was a specific and limited release.
Access to private road was permitted where construction of other access was infeasible and therefore rendered inaccessible property that had also been opened for public hunting, such that use of the private road would serve public purposes. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Failure to object to introduction of evidence of blood draw refusal rendered issue waived for appeal even where new rule of law concerning blood draw refusals was promulgated following trial and during pendency of appeal. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Husband was not entitled to a modification of alimony pendente lite based on wifes alleged conduct in delaying the proceeding, because husband acquiesced in any such delays.