Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Allegation that decedent contracted fatal cancer due to exposure to radioactive source material rendered claims subject to federal jurisdiction under the Price-Anderson Act. Summary judgment affirmed.
Trial court did not err in considering sales price in fixing fair market value of foreclosed properties for deficiency judgment, where trial court also considered other factors addressed by parties appraisers, including condition of property, rental history, and below-asking price offers. Order of the trial court affirmed
The court denied a criminal defendants motion to dismiss where the offenses involved in the instant case were not logically or temporally part of the same criminal episode.
Given the U.S. Supreme Courts recent decision in Pittman v. Pa. Bd. of Probation and Parole, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole erred in determining that it lacked discretion to award petitioner credit for time spent at liberty on parole.
Pursuant to Pennsylvania precedent following the U.S. Supreme Courts 2012 decision in Miller v Alabama, the court rejected defendants claim that his sentence to 30-years-to-life for a homicide committed while he was a juvenile was illegal.
Taxicab regulating authority's per-vehicle assessment on partial rights taxicab operators was arbitrary and unreasonable where assessments were derived from an estimate of the number of vehicles that would be in service. Order of the trial court reversed.
State board of barber examiners erred in denying petition for reinstatement based on prior drug convictions and/or insufficient rehabilitation from such convictions
Publication Date: 2008-07-30 Practice Area: Industry: Date Filed: 2008-07-25 Court:DC Cir. Judge:Sentelle, Chief Judge Attorneys:For plaintiff: For appellant: J. Mark Gidley, White & Case, Washington, D.C. for defendant: For appellee: Alisa Klein, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Case Number: 07-5191, CONSOLIDATED WITH 07-5192
Argued April 21, 2008Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.This is an appeal by Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group ("Stolt-Nielsen") from a summary judgment in favor o