Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Phipps
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-2283
Appellant Mall Chevrolet, Inc., appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment to General Motors, LLC.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Rendell
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1990
Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their complaint.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Insurance Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Jordan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1096
Appellant appealed the dismissal of its breach of contract claim against Multiplan, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-04-29
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Krause
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2013
Appellant appealed the district court's dismissal of her complaint for failure to state a claim.
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2023 CV 2114
Plaintiff mother sued defendant son relating to defendant's possession of a dog. The court rejected plaintiff's claims.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Coddington, Hicks, Danforth
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2021 CV 4073
The trial court granted a motion in limine filed by plaintiffs in anticipation of opening statements in a medical malpractice case that sought leave of court to use admissible excerpts of videotaped depositions of defense witnesses they did not identify.
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2021 CV 4073
The trial court granted a motion in limine filed by plaintiffs in anticipation of opening statements in a medical malpractice case that sought leave of court to use admissible excerpts of videotaped depositions of defense witnesses they did not identify.
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Murray
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 460 EDA 2023
Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence on his conviction for driving under the influence-controlled substance and related crimes. The court affirmed, holding that expert testimony was not necessary to support appellant's conviction for DUI-controlled substance where a testifying trooper opined that appellant was under the influence based upon his observations, the outcome of field sobriety testing, and the officer's training and experience.
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Wrongful Death
Industry: Construction | Manufacturing
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Fletman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1665
In a §1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Superior Court to affirms its order granting summary judgment to defendant and denying plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration in a wrongful death matter where plaintiffs failed to submit sufficient evidence including expert testimony to overcome summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas
Judge: Judge Powell
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00472
In this §1925(a) opinion, the trial court asked the Superior Court to affirm its orders granting motions in limine that precluded the plaintiff in a motor vehicle collision case from introducing evidence concerning her future medical expenses and treatment for her permanent injuries and precluding presentation of testimony or evidence concerning a medial branch block and radio ablation that she underwent more than two years after her initial treatment.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read