• Transformation Yoga Project

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry: Non-Profit
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Chester County
    Judge: Judge Binder
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 15-23-1714

    Petitioner nonprofit Pennsylvania corporation and public charity sought the court's approval of an agreement to transfer its assets to a new entity. The court denied the petition without prejudice where petitioner failed to aver that the separate existence of a trust solely for charitable purposes would result in administrative expense or other burdens unreasonably out of proportion to the trust's charitable benefits.

  • Commonwealth v. Curtis Total Serv., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Discovery
    Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lehigh County
    Judge: Judge Johnson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2022-C-1276

    The parties filed competing motions regarding plaintiff's authority to conduct discovery regarding defendants' alleged violations of consumer protection laws which were unknown to plaintiff when it filed suit or which arose afterward. The court concluded plaintiff could conduct discovery regarding unknown alleged violations for the five years preceding its complaint, and regarding alleged violations that arose afterward.

  • Commonwealth v. Ellis

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Kunselman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 742 MDA 2023

    Defendant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence imposing a life term on defendant's jury conviction for murder and related crimes. The court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not violate defendant's right to remain silent by directing defendant to remove nonprescription eyeglasses that defendant wore during his jury trial.

  • K.H. v. Dep't of Human Serv.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Wojcik
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 739 C.D. 2022

    Court quashed appeal denying access to purportedly privileged information in child abuse investigation, where denial of discovery motion was not a collateral order as relief would not be irrevocably lost if review were postponed until resolution of the expunction appeal. Appeal quashed.

  • Commonwealth v. Kline

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 942 MDA 2023

    Appellant appealed his sentence after a jury found him guilty of multiple counts relating to the sexual abuse of the victims, his minor children. Sentence affirmed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Law of Advertising, Marketing and Promotions

    Authors: David Bernstein, Bruce Keller, Paul D. Rubin, Jared Kagan

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Commonwealth v. McIntyre

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Panella
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 354 EDA 2023

    The court affirmed appellant's judgment of sentence following his conviction for person prohibited from possessing a firearm in violation of 18 Pa. C.S A. §6105(a)(1) against a challenge that §6105 is unconstitutional in the wake of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022).

  • Jones v. Employees of the DOC of PA at SCI-Phoenix

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Rufe
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-2386

    Court dismissed prisoner's Eighth Amendment claim where it amounted to a mere disagreement over the course of treatment for vaccine side effects, and there was no allegation that medical staff denied reasonable requests for treatment. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted.

  • Fooks v. Superintendent, Smithfield SCI

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry: Legal Services
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Bibas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-2097

    State and federal courts erred in denying evidentiary hearings in collateral relief proceedings where defendant alleged that trial counsel's misstatements regarding parole eligibility influenced defendant's decision to plead guilty, constituting a prima facie claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Order of the district court reversed, case remanded.

  • Schwartz v. Kelly Serv., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Recruitment and Staffing
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 755 EDA 2023

    Appellant appealed the denial of its motion to compel arbitration in dispute over teacher's employment and court found the record was inadequate and trial court erroneously resolved a question of fact. Vacated and remanded.

  • Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches v. Sec'y Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

    Publication Date: 2024-04-12
    Practice Area: Election and Political Law
    Industry: Non-Profit | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Ambro
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-3166

    Appellants argued district court erred in holding the Materiality Provision applied to the Pennsylvania law that required a voter to date a mail-in ballot and court found the Materiality Provision was concerned only with the process of determining a voter's eligibility to cast a ballot and the date requirement for casting a mail-in ballot was not covered and did not violate the Materiality Provision. Reversed.