Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Appellant appealed the court's order appointing a successor administrator to the estate of appellant's deceased father. The court requested that its order be affirmed where the court had jurisdiction to enter the order, which appointed a neutral estate administrator in light of ongoing litigation among estate beneficiaries.
City and city councilman appealed the court's denial of their appeal of a decision of city's zoning board of adjustment that granted property owner's application for a commercial property use permit. The court requested that its decision be affirmed where Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence that the approved variance was properly limited in scope for a unique property and would not result in adverse impacts.
Claimant appealed board's decision as to her entitlement to attorney fees and court reversed board's order to the extent it automatically foreclosed the imposition of attorney fees against employer after its contest became reasonable and disregarded the plain language of §440(a). Reversed and remanded.
The court granted defendant's motion to transfer a patent infringement case to the District of Delaware where another similar but not identical case was first filed even though it had been stayed while awaiting a ruling by the Federal Circuit on an issue litigated before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for inter partes review.
Board of claims erred in sustaining government agency's preliminary objections on a legal basis different from that raised in the agency's objections. Order of the Board of Claims vacated and remanded.