Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Orphans' court properly applied cy pres doctrine to affirm successor to trust beneficiary, where successor charity fulfilled testator's intent to provide for physical well-being of community by bequeathing to non-profit hospital so long as it served community health. Order of the orphans' court affirmed.
Grant of summary judgment in favor of company dismissing negligence claim as barred under borrowed employee doctrine premature due to outstanding issues of material fact concerning worker control. Summary judgment reversed, case remanded.
Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 1.11(c) did not disqualify wife's attorney in this divorce action, though counsel was involved in the prosecution of the defendant husband during her prior work for a district attorney's office, because the two matters were not substantially similar. The court denied defendant's motion to disqualify plaintiff's attorney.
Class certification granted where several named plaintiffs had exhausted their administrative remedies, permitting the class claims to go through via the doctrine of vicarious exhaustion. Plaintiffs' motion for class certification granted.
Publication Date: 2018-06-12 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Lazarus Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0685
Quashal was properly denied where special prosecutor specifically authorized to utilize grand jury and to issue a presentment for perjury and related charges. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
The court refused to quash firearms charges against a defendant who had been convicted of impersonating a police officer in another state, because defendant failed to demonstrate that both his gun rights and his civil rights had been restored.
The Dram Shop Act was a limiting statute, which barred plaintiffs from pursuing other negligence claims. Plaintiffs' complaint adequately alleged that defendant's employees served liquor to an individual who was visibly intoxicated, so the court overruled those preliminary objections.
The report of defendants' addiction expert was inadmissible to the extent it sought to establish that plaintiff consumed alcohol daily around the time of his fall since the record did not contain an adequate basis in fact for the expert's proffered opinions. The court granted plaintiff's motion in limine in part.
The trial court erred in holding that once two school districts elected to opt out of the Carbon County Tax Claim Bureau's collection services under the Real Estate Tax Sale Law, the Bureau was not authorized to act as the districts' agent for tax collection purposes and, thus, the districts' property tax claims had a fourth priority status. The court reversed and remanded.
In this criminal proceeding against a fraternity for the hazing death of a pledge, the court concluded that defendant's statements of error regarding its right to present a defense were without merit.