Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2018-05-22 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Lazarus Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0605
Orders denying kinship care and involuntarily terminated parental rights reversed where parents complied with service plan goals and where there was no record evidence to find that kinship care would place child at risk, but was instead motivated by trial court's desire to have parents admit to child abuse rather than proper purpose of maintaining family unity. Orders of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Petitioner's exceptions were overruled in his appeal of the denial of his petition as untimely filed because, despite having been advised of his appeal rights by October 22, 2009 at the latest, petitioner waited one and one-half years before filing his petition and he provided no explanation for the delay other than an alleged non-receipt of the notice, which was belied by the undisputed facts. Exceptions overruled.
Trial court erred in dismissing conversion and unjust enrichment complaint stemming from removal of timber where evidence suggested plaintiffs reserved for themselves a real property interest in the timber. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Plaintiffs' medical expert report, which only addressed the care provided by the defendant physician, lacked sufficient expert opinion to establish a prima facie claim for vicarious liability or corporate negligence on the part of the defendant hospital. The court granted the defendant hospital's motion for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2018-05-22 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Bowes Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0611
Juvenile court authorized to grant legal custody to DHS and empower it to make routine medical decisions on behalf of children in its custody, even over the objections of a child's parent, guardian, or custodian. Order of the juvenile court affirmed.
The Underground Storage Indemnification Fund, a statutorily mandated fund in which all owners of active underground storage tanks must participate and which provides coverage to clean up tank releases, is comparable to insurance and covered by the collateral source rule. The court overruled defendants' collateral source rule preliminary objection.
Plaintiff's counsel disqualified where it had retained defendant's former employee to disclose confidential and proprietary information she had obtained in her employment with defendant. Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's counsel granted.
Publication Date: 2018-05-22 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Olson Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0607
Defendant's consent to blood draw was voluntary where she was not advised that she would be subject to criminal penalties for refusal, and where totality of circumstances indicated that defendant understood her rights to refuse a blood draw and was not under coercion or duress. Orders of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Publication Date: 2018-05-22 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Shogan Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0608
Denial of permanent alimony properly denied where wife filed incredible monthly budget that exceeded her monthly income and husband credibly testified as to the parties' standard of living during the marriage. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2018-05-22 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Olson Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0606
Defendant's subjective belief that he would be subject to criminal penalties for refusing a warrantless blood draw could not render his consent involuntary. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.