Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
When respondent created an irrevocable trust naming himself and two of his six siblings as beneficiaries and transferred decedent's property into the trust under his power of attorney, effectively disinheriting his other siblings, respondent breached his fiduciary duty to attempt to preserve decedent's estate plan. The court sustained objector's objections.
District court properly held that plaintiff's FDCPA action was untimely, where plaintiff sued when he discovered a default judgment five years after it was entered, because the plain text of the statue incorporated an occurrence rule and belied plaintiff's arguments for a discovery rule. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-05-29 Practice Area:Trusts and Estates Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Ott Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0633
Estate beneficiary waived challenge to private sale of estate property by failing to appeal from order affirming sale. Order of the orphans' court affirmed in part and vacated in part, case remanded.
Search warrant to search for any game or wildlife parts overbroad where affidavit in support of probable cause referred solely to the unreported killing of a particular deer and retention of its parts in violation of the Game and Wildlife Code. Order of the trial court reversed, judgment of sentence vacated, case remanded.
The trial court correctly found that logging company was not entitled to a prescriptive easement on a lane running through landowner's land because substantial evidence supported the trial judge's findings that the lane passed through an "unenclosed woodland" and the unenclosed woodlands act barred a prescriptive easement. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-05-22 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Kunselman Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0619
Trial court erred in finding that expert child custody evaluator had no standing to bring a contempt action asking the court to enforce its order directing mother to pay a portion of his fees because mother was ordered by the court to pay the costs and thus, the court was the proper court to adjudicate the alleged contempt of its order. Reversed.
Trial court erred in striking objectors' appeal of the zoning board's holding that objectors lacked standing to appeal the zoning officer's pre-liminary opinion approving a landfill expansion because board erred in finding that objectors lacked standing since the discernable effects on objectors' use and enjoyment of their properties were not merely aesthetic concerns and raised legitimate concerns about air quality and health. Reversed and remanded.
Trial court properly dismissed appellant's claims against her fitness club for her slip and fall injury because her claims were barred by the exculpatory clause in the membership agreement she had signed. Affirmed.
Plaintiff, a prison inmate subject to Act 84 deductions from his prison account to satisfy financial obligations based on criminal convictions, asserted a viable Due Process Clause claim that he was entitled to and deprived of some form of pre-deprivation notice before any funds were taken from his account. The appellate court reversed and remanded.