Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Trial court erred in denying boards motion to dismiss appellants petition for review of boards letter determining that composting opera-tion was not a violation of the conservation easement on the land because no law gave appellant a third party right to enforce the ease-ment and the boards letter was not an adjudication under the local agency law.
Defendant was entitled to discovery of private information from plaintiffs social media accounts, but the court required counsel for plaintiffs to review the information and determine whether each item fell within the broad scope of discovery specified in Pa.R.C.P. 4003.1.
The court granted defendants application for a bill of particulars, requiring the commonwealth to set for the substance of the charges against defendant involving alleged false statements and obstruction of the administration of law.
Townships challenge to trial courts order regarding townships motion to exclude certain documents as privileged was denied because township had waived its attorney-client and work product privilege claims when it did not appeal the masters report that released the documents to its opponent in a breach of contract action.
Publication Date: 2018-03-20 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stabile Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0286
Appellant not entitled to newly-discovered facts exceptions to PCRA time-bar where scientific principles underpinning his new expert opinions were publicly available years prior to the filing of appellants petition.
Court granted in part and denied in part defendant insurers and general agents motion for summary judgment in plaintiffs action as-serting breach of contract, tortious interference, and unfair competition over the transfer of his book of business to another agency.
Trial court abused its discretion in denying appellants request for a charging lien on funds in his escrow account because while appel-lant overstepped his bounds in asserting a charging lien for fees owed to him in other cases, he was entitled to the contingent fee he was owed in the current case.
Expert opinions in products liability case were admitted as sufficiently reliable where based on medical training and experience, and mechanical testing of allegedly defective product.
Defendant could compel production of plaintiffs Instagram log-in information were plaintiffs public postings on Instagram called into question the extent of her alleged injuries and made potentially private postings relevant to this personal injury lawsuit.
Trial court properly reversed CSCs determination on disciplinary charges, where inconsistent with its findings of fact, and where otherwise without basis in the record before the CSC.