Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Defendant insurer was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs underinsured motorist claim because the regular use exception in the policy applied where plaintiff was injured in accident while heading to a work site in employers truck as he regularly did and there was no basis for plaintiffs bad faith claim. Motion granted.
The trial court erred in denying requester access to the Butler Area School Districts property tax assessment list since the property list sought by requester did not qualify as sufficiently personal in nature to trigger a balancing test against the public interest in disclosure. The court reversed the trial court orders and directed disclosure.
Defendant was notified by his probation officer of both the general and special conditions of his probation. The court held his probation was properly revoked.
Publication Date: 2017-11-21 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1700
Defendant, a sex offender, had until midnight on the third business day after he changed his address to register with state police to comply with the requirements of Pennsylvanias Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, at 42 Pa.C.S. §9799.15(g). The appellate court reversed defendants conviction and vacated his sentence.
Adjoining property owners intervening in a land use settlement approval did not waive their right to appeal where such waiver was not explicitly included in the agreed-upon stipulation.. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Law enforcement had a reasonable belief that defendant was at a residence based on an anonymous tip, a photograph, and a view of defendant through a window of the residence. The court denied defendants motion to suppress.
Court dismissed plaintiffs claims against insurer for failure to pay benefits under his employers long-term disability benefits plan because after the case was transferred to federal court based on ERISA preemption, plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint asserting ERISA claims, failed to respond to insurers motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution and failed to provide the court with a status update. Case dismissed.
Orphans court correctly denied appellants claim that decedents transfer of death designation for a bank account was invalid but went too far in finding that the account was a non-probate asset because the court never addressed appellants alternative undue influence claim. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Publication Date: 2017-11-21 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Olson Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1701
In this case of first impression, the court ruled that §9799.24(e)(3) of the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act violated the federal and state constitutions because it increased the criminal penalty to which a defendant is exposed without the chosen fact-finder making the necessary factual findings beyond a reasonable doubt. The court vacated an order finding defendant to be a sexually violent predator and remanded for notice under 42 Pa.C.S. §9799.23.
Court found that forum selection clause in agreement between photo stock agency and publisher did not apply to photographer who sued publisher for copyright infringement and court transferred venue to the district of New Jersey because plaintiff photographer was located in New Jersey and the Jumara factors weighed in favor of transfer. Motion to transfer granted.