Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Defendant was not entitled to open default judgment in this ejectment case where he failed to demonstrate improper notice or raise a meritorious defense.
The court found that plaintiffs CFAA claim against former employees romantic partner and company he worked for was proper because it was based on an indirect access theory, but claim against former employee failed because she was authorized to access the information, and plaintiffs direct costs of responding to or assessing the damage from the violation were recoverable even without an interruption of service. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2018-02-27 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Elliott Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0202
In this case of first impression, the appellate court found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered defendant to be shackled during the viewing of the crime scene for reasons of safety and security. The appellate court affirmed defendants judgment of sentence.
Publication Date: 2018-02-27 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stevens Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0201
Police had a reasonable basis to conduct a pedestrian stop of defendant, who was loitering in a high-crime area, where they had an obligation to investigate complaints of loitering and drug sales; therefore, counsel was not ineffective for failing to preserve this meritless issue for appellate review. The appellate court affirmed an order denying defendants Post Conviction Relief Act petition.
The defendant in this ejectment action could not assert a collateral attack on the underlying sheriff sale since an attack on the foreclosure within an ejectment action is only proper where the court in the foreclosure action lacked jurisdiction. The court granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.
Medical expert opinion opining that, if claimant had suffered a work injury, she had recovered from same, was sufficiently valid to permit employer to contest termination and review petitions. Order of the WCAB affirmed.
Trial court erred in upholding arbitrators award granting associations grievance over districts issuance of a request for proposals for custodial services during negotiations and ordering that RFPs could not be used in bargaining with the association because the award did not draw its essence from the CBA, which prohibited subcontracting, but never mentioned RFPS, and the arbitrators award contravened the public policy of good faith bargaining. Reversed.
Court granted defendants motion for summary judgment in plaintiffs breach of contract claim because plaintiff had the opportunity to test the software as it was developed and its failure to provide the notice required by the contract that the deliverables were unacceptable barred recovery. Motion granted.
Procedurally defaulted ineffective assistance of appellate counsel could not be raised in federal habeas proceeding, since such claim had to be heard in collateral proceeding where lack of constitutionally guarantee of counsel meant there was no basis to excuse procedural default. Order of the district court affirmed.