Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-03-20
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Health Care Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Chung
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1375
Defendant appealed her conviction for conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud and healthcare fraud.
Publication Date: 2024-03-19
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge per curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-2776
Petitioner appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.
Publication Date: 2024-03-18
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Food and Beverage | Hospitality and Lodging | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Restrepo
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1297
Seller did not breach implied covenant of good faith in negotiations simply by increasing its asking price, as non-binding letter of intent allowed parties to terminate negotiations except to breach exclusivity provision.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Wood
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1381-CV-2022
The court granted defendants' motion to compel an independent medical examination of the plaintiff in a personal injury case arising out of a motor vehicle accident.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Non-Profit | State and Local Government
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Mundy
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 71 MAP 2022
Appellant Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association sought review of the Commonwealth Court's judgment affirming a decision of the Office of Open Records that deemed appellant subject to the Right-to-Know Law. The court affirmed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Jason D. Krieser, Shawn C. Helms, Heather S. Bethancourt
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Education Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kearney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-3180
Parents' challenged hearing officer's finding that school district's March 2022 individualized education plan offered child a free appropriate public education and court found officer did not sufficiently explain the basis for her decision, particularly as it related to her prior finding that the May 2021 IEP denied child an FAPE, and applied the wrong legal standard in her analysis. Motion denied and remanded.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Jubelirer
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 363 C.D. 2022
Governor's office adequately requested additional time to review requested documents for privilege or exemption from disclosure where the office's affirmation expressly identified potential exemptions based on the activities of the officials whose records were sought. Final determination of the Office of Open Records affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Powell
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 01913
In a §1925(a) opinion, the court urged affirmance of its order granting the defendant lawyer and law firm's motion to reopen the default judgment that the Superior Court had declared void ab initio because plaintiff's Rule 237.5 ten-day notice did not substantially comply with the rule which was a fatal defect.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Ceisler
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 800 C.D. 2021
Trial court erred in affirming Office of Open Records in Right-to-Know Law case because no actual case or controversy existed where agency had not released records that were no longer requested by requester and district attorney's office met its burden of proof that the remaining requested record did not exist. Reversed.
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Food and Beverage | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge McHugh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3296
Party violated arbitration award enforcing a settlement where party's contractual right to reimbursement of legal expenses was superseded by the settlement and party's distribution of company cash left insufficient reserves for operational expenses as required by the award. Plaintiff's motion for contempt granted, defendant's cross-motion to enforce settlement granted in part.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read