Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Although zoning ordinance restricting discharge of firearms implicated right to bear arms, such regulations were consistent with the historical tradition of restricting the discharge of firearms and the location of designated shooting ranges. Order of the commonwealth court reversed and remanded.
Superior court erred in denying attorney fees in appellant's action over a non-compete agreement and erred insofar as it imposed an absolute bar on the award of damages after the non-compete period expired but appellant did not establish at trial that it suffered lost-profit damages extending beyond the non-compete period. Reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Appellant appealed the trial court's denial of his appeal from the suspension of his vehicle operating privilege for 18 months, and from the lifetime disqualification of his commercial driving privilege. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part, concluding that appellant was not subject to lifetime disqualification of his commercial driving privilege where the officer who arrested him for driving a private vehicle under the influence failed to advise him that his refusal to submit to a blood test could result in lifetime loss o
Plaintiff credit card issuer sought judgment against defendant cardholder for the balance due on defendant's account. The court awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant where plaintiff proffered credible evidence that defendant ceased making payments on his card balance, leaving an outstanding balance due.
Defendants moved to certify on interlocutory appeal a question as to the application of the first-to-file doctrine in a qui tam action and court found there was no controlling question of law. Motion denied.
In this §1925(a) opinion, the court urged that its judgment in favor of defendant, a motorist who rear-ended plaintiff's vehicle, be affirmed in its entirety.
Transmittal of personal debt information from a debt collector to its third-party mailing vendor did not rise to the level of public disclosure of private information necessary to confer Article III standing to allege a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violation. Order of the district court affirmed.
Commonwealth court properly found college's project fell outside the purview of the Prevailing Wage Act and it was not "paid for in whole or in part out of the funds of a public body" by virtue of authority's role in providing conduit financing for the project under the circumstances in this case. Affirmed.
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs' action alleging defamation, breach of the non-disparagement and property return of provisions of the severance agreement, intentional infliction of emotional distress and violations of the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act, the Federal Defense of Trade Secrets Act and the Lanham Act and court found defendant's post on a job website was not commercial speech under the Lanham act but there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute as to all of plaintiffs' other claims. Motion denied in p