Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-03-06
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2715
Plaintiff appealed the denial of her motion to reopen and enforce a settlement agreement and the grant of defendant's motion to compel arbitration.
Publication Date: 2024-03-05
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge per curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-3262
Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to extend the time to appeal the district court's order remanding the underlying action to state court.
Publication Date: 2024-03-05
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Porter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3285
Defendant appealed her conviction for fraud and theft-related offenses and her 159-month sentence.
Publication Date: 2024-03-04
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Hardiman
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Troy Rivetti, Donovan J. Cocas, Laura S. Irwin, Matthew S. McHale, Office of United States Attorney, Pittsburgh, PA for appellant.
for defendant: Kelvin L. Morris, Law Office of Kelvin L. Morris, Pittsburgh, PA for appellee.
Case Number: 22-3033
District court procedurally erred in excluding evidence in child pornography prosecution by not viewing proffered materials before concluding that the risk of unfair prejudice outweighed the materials' probative value.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2355
Plaintiff, a federal inmate, appealed the dismissal of his Bivens action.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Julian S. Millstein, Jeffrey D. Neuburger, Jeffrey P. Weingart
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18 EDA 2023
Trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of insurer in appellant's action for UIM coverage and court found appellant's car policy's household exclusion was valid and enforceable, UIM coverage in her mother's car's policy, which she was driving at the time of the accident, was the only UIM coverage applicable and the coordination of benefits clause had no effect. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Scott
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-0263
Court erred in dismissing religious failure to accommodate claim where employee presented prima facie evidence that she had a religiously connected, sincerely held objection to receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Defendant's motion for summary judgment denied in part and granted in part.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Olson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2510 EDA 2022
Trial court should have denied suppression motion where totality of circumstances, including the fact that the subject vehicle was registered to someone whom defendant failed to explain his connection to, indicated that defendant lacked a privacy interest in the vehicle and thus defendant failed to bear his burden to prove that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2017-09856
The court issued its decision on damages in a suit between an injured motorist and her insurance company that found the insurance company acted in bad faith, assessed attorneys' fees based on a contingency agreement and awarded punitive damages.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 7623 CV 2022
Appellant landowner appealed township's denial of its special exception application to construct a warehouse. The court affirmed where appellant's proposed use for its property was as a warehouse building that would be employed as a distribution center/truck terminal, which was not a permitted use.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read