Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Objectors petitioned to set aside nomination papers of the Socialism and Liberation candidates for President and Vice President of the United States in the November 2024 general election. The court granted the petition, holding that Socialism and Liberation's nomination papers and slate of candidates had to be struck where seven of the body's presidential electors were registered Democrats and thus were disqualified under the Pennsylvania Election Code's disaffiliation provision.
Defendant filed an omnibus pretrial motion that included a motion to suppress evidence and pretrial writ of habeas corpus. The court denied the motion, holding that police had probable cause to obtain sequential drug trafficking search warrants for two apartments where a confidential informant made controlled drug buys from defendant's downstairs apartment and, subsequently, defendant and others fled to an upstairs unit as officers arrived to execute the first search warrant. The court held further that the Commonwealth presented evid
Defendants moved to disqualify and sanction plaintiff's counsel in plaintiff's action alleging discriminatory denial of his right to develop certain properties. The court denied the motion for disqualification and granted in part the motion for sanctions, holding that plaintiff's attorney did not violate the letter of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct where his client contacted former township officials regarding potentially privileged matters while his lawsuit was pending.
No error in suspending license of a teacher who knowingly allowed a paramour who had been designated a sexually violent predator into her home with her minor daughter, which led to her charges of endangering the welfare of a child. Order of the Professional Standards and Practices Commission affirmed.
Defendant municipal gas utility appealed the court's order scheduling an injunction petition for hearing while maintaining the status quo of uninterrupted gas service to building residents. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed, holding that it had subject matter jurisdiction, and was not required to defer to the Public Utilities Commission, where plaintiff property owners sought to preserve the status quo, including provision of uninterrupted gas service to low-income tenants, while the parties' other litigation ran i
Publication Date: 2024-09-13 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Supreme Court Judge:Justice Dougherty Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 108 MAP 2023
Trial court had jurisdiction to issue predicate findings for special immigrant juvenile status when making a custody determination that granted sole custody to one parent. Order of the superior court reversed and remanded.
The court granted plaintiff's motion for class certification pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1710 with respect to claims for violation of the Philadelphia Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards Ordinance.
Publication Date: 2024-09-13 Practice Area:Trusts and Estates Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Lane Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 892 EDA 2023
Court erred in dismissing fiduciary action under the doctrine of lis pendens where plaintiff's separate pending objections to her guardian's accounting involved different claims and parties. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Petitioner sought review of an administrative order adopting an administrative law judge's recommendation and dismissing as untimely its appeal from certain agency actions. The court affirmed, holding that by merely asserting lack of notice below, petitioner failed to overcome the presumption of service under the mailbox rule and demonstrated no basis for nunc pro tunc relief after its failure to timely appeal the disputed agency decisions. The court held further that petitioner waived its various arguments by failing to present them,
Publication Date: 2024-09-13 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stabile Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 511 EDA 2023
Commonwealth appealed the trial court's order granting appellee's motion to dismiss charges due to a violation of his speedy trial rights. The court vacated the order and remanded for trial, holding that appellee suffered no speedy trial violation when two periods of excludable delay were included in the timeline between Commonwealth's filing of charges and appellee's scheduled trial date.