Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Trial court erred in upholding license suspension under implied consent law where a separate, explicit request to submit to chemical testing was required after reading implied consent warnings and there was inadequate evidence to find that a separate request was made. Order of the trial court reversed.
Publication Date: 2024-08-23 Practice Area:Evidence Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 787 WDA 2023
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text messages and emails that were sufficiently authenticated by appellee's testimony. Appellant's judgment of sentence affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-08-23 Practice Area:Personal Injury Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 837 EDA 2022
Trial court erred in applying Child Protective Services Law to reject wife's invocation of spousal privilege to resist deposition on her conversations with her late husband regarding child sexual abuse allegations against him, where alleged victim failed to overcome presumption in favor of confidentiality of spousal communications. Order of the trial court reversed.
District court erred in calculating length of injunction on competitive activity where parties' agreement allowed extension of non-compete provision equal to duration of breach but district court found defendants' first breach inconsequential.
The court denied defendant's motion for sanctions based on plaintiff's counsel's questions posed to a corporate witness about the corporation's criminal convictions that resulted in a mistrial in a personal injury case.
Trial court erred in rescinding license suspension where Vehicle Code expressly defined Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition as a "prior offense" and case law declaring the relevant provisions of the Vehicle Code unconstitutional had been expressly overruled. Order of the trial court reversed.