Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Plaintiffs Marla Knudsen and William Dutra, representing a class of similarly situated employees, appealed the district court's dismissal of their ERISA class action against MetLife Group, Inc.
Plaintiffs, two commercial fishermen, appealed the district court's denial of their motion for summary judgment and grant of the government's cross-motion for summary judgment.
Appellant, a former police officer with the North Brunswick Police Department, appealed the district court's grant of judgment on the pleadings to defendant Township of New Brunswick.
Accountants' testimony did not constitute improper lay opinion testimony where their discussion of accounting concepts was merely foundational to their fact testimony, which was based on their personal experiences with the fraudulent scheme in the case.
Plaintiffs appealed the district court's order that granted summary judgment in favor of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., concluding that plaintiffs' state law claims were preempted by federal law.
The court granted the motion of the co-executors, the son and daughter of the testate decedent, to vacate the election of Dorothy Andersen as spouse to take against the will of Richard Girio because Andersen was not the common law spouse of the decedent.
Publication Date: 2024-09-20 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Murray Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 129 WDA 2024
Appellant appealed the post-conviction relief court's denial of his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act. The court affirmed, holding that the PCRA court did not err in declining to deem appellant's version of facts admitted where Commonwealth failed to answer appellant's PCRA petition as ordered by the PCRA court.