Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Defendant city sought summary judgment in plaintiff's personal injury action alleging liability for a hazardous condition on a roadway. The court granted the motion, holding that plaintiff could not recover as a matter of law where she admitted in deposition testimony that she was not watching where she was going as she crossed the street in her mobility scooter, and that had she been watching she would have seen and avoided the clearly dangerous pothole in the road.
Claimant petitioned for review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed two decisions of a Workers' Compensation Judge regarding claimant's post-injury claim. The court affirmed, holding that the WCJ correctly identified claimant's employer as the subcontractor that he worked for on a construction project, which had purchased WC insurance through the general contractor-controlled insurance program, rather than the general contractor itself. The court concluded further that the WCJ correctly calculated the su
Publication Date: 2024-08-23 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Bowes Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 2084 EDA 2020
Appellant appealed the dismissal of his Post Conviction Relief Act petition. The court affirmed, overruling prior authority and holding that appellant's allegation of illegal sentencing in violation of Apprendi was subject to harmless error review. The court concluded that in appellant's case, he suffered no illegal sentence where, despite a Sixth Amendment violation, the Apprendi sentencing error was harmless.
Plaintiffs established Article III standing for data breach by alleging that their personally identifiable information ended up on the dark web, requiring them to take affirmative identity theft mitigation efforts and suffering various incidents of alleged identity theft. Defendant's motion to dismiss denied in part and granted in part.
Defendant property owner appealed the trial court's judgment in favor of plaintiff real estate brokerage firm. The court opined that its judgment should be affirmed where plaintiff was properly awarded recovery of a leasing commission pursuant to the parties' former exclusive agency agreement after a prior tenant amended its lease to include additional space in defendant's building.
Publication Date: 2024-08-23 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Murray Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 2591 EDA 2021
Evidence was sufficient to support a finding of malice in DUI vehicular homicide case where record showed defendant had ample opportunity to recognize severe intoxication, making his decision to continue driving sufficiently reckless to constitute malice. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Insurer was obligated to provide defense in underlying action that initially alleged the existence of a franchise agreement, pursuant to insurance policy's franchisor endorsement, but insurer had no indemnification obligation where underlying action ultimately established a lack of a franchise relationship. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part.
Personal injury plaintiffs appealed the court's order granting appellee property owner's motion to dismiss on the basis of forum non conveniens. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where the accident at issue occurred in a business located in Delaware, appellee had merely minimal connections with Pennsylvania, and Delaware was a viable alternative forum for appellants' suit.
The court affirmed the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County granting the application of Lowell Lundy to liquidate and dissolve the Mt. Vernon Tenants Association, Inc. and appoint a liquidating receiver for the association under § 5981 of the Nonprofit Corporation Law of 1988, 15 Pa. C.S. § 5981.