Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-08-22
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1293
Mark Weller appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law to Linde North America Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-08-20
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Roth
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2967
District court erred in calculating length of injunction on competitive activity where parties' agreement allowed extension of non-compete provision equal to duration of breach but district court found defendants' first breach inconsequential.
Publication Date: 2024-08-20
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2541
Appellant Autobar Systems of New Jersey appealed the denial of a preliminary injunction.
Publication Date: 2024-08-19
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Freeman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-3120
Matthew Nisbett appealed the judgment of sentence.
Publication Date: 2024-08-16
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Carlucci
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-01214
The court granted defendant Baney's motion for summary judgment in a personal injury case.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-08-16
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CV 22-00,260
The court denied defendant's motion for sanctions based on plaintiff's counsel's questions posed to a corporate witness about the corporation's criminal convictions that resulted in a mistrial in a personal injury case.
Publication Date: 2024-08-16
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Wojcik
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 875 C.D. 2021
Trial court erred in rescinding license suspension where Vehicle Code expressly defined Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition as a "prior offense" and case law declaring the relevant provisions of the Vehicle Code unconstitutional had been expressly overruled. Order of the trial court reversed.
Publication Date: 2024-08-16
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Murray
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1332 WDA 2023
Appellant appealed from judgments of sentence entered on a jury conviction for burglary and related crimes. The court affirmed, holding that appellant was timely tried for purposes of Pa.R.Crim.P. 600 where he was brought to trial more than two months before his adjusted Rule 600 run date in light of excludable delays that included COVID-19 pandemic court closures.
Publication Date: 2024-08-16
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Hardiman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-3797
The court affirmed the district court's order dismissing appellant's civil rights claims for failure to exhaust his state administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Publication Date: 2024-08-16
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: E-Commerce | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 16-573
Both parties filed post-judgment motions after second jury deadlocked on whether plaintiff Uber drivers were misclassified as independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act and court drew on its inherent authority to dismiss this case with prejudice and granted defendant's rule 50(b) motion for relief. Motion granted.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read