• Ryan v. United States

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Damages
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 24-1464

    Plaintiff appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint and the denial of his motion for reconsideration.

  • Gruen v. Gruen

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-3080

    Plaintiff Yoel Gruen appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint.

  • Donofrio v. IKEA US Retail, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Attorney Rates and Arrangements
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Brody
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-599

    Defendant challenged plaintiffs' request for attorney's fees after the court granted plaintiffs' motion for sanctions due to defendant's litigation misconduct. The court concluded in pertinent part that the reasonable hourly rates for plaintiffs' experienced attorneys in connection with plaintiffs' motion for sanctions was $771.75 per hour, which was the bottom range of the Community Legal Services of Philadelphia fee schedule for attorneys with more than 25 years of experience, adjusted for inflation.

  • Ogden Directories, Inc. v. Pisanchyn Law Firm, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Litigation
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Judge: Judge Nealon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2023 CV 4561

    Defendant law firm filed preliminary objections to plaintiff's complaint for breach of contract and unjust enrichment arising out of defendant's failure to pay for advertising services. The court overruled the preliminary objections where the factual averments in plaintiff's lengthy complaint, together with over 300 pages of supporting exhibits, sufficiently apprised defendant of plaintiff's claims and essential supporting facts.

  • Commonwealth v. Carter

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Lazarus
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 432 WDA 2023

    Commonwealth appealed the trial court's order granting defendant's motion in limine to preclude "other bad acts" evidence from being introduced in defendant's criminal homicide trial. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding that the trial court did not err in excluding evidence showing that defendant shot a witness to his crime while they were both in another state, but that the trial court did err in excluding evidence that defendant fled to that state after committing his alleged Pennsylvania crime.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice 2024: A Practical Guide

    Authors: KENNETH DEL VECCHIO

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Gill-Gayle v. Giant Co., LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Sánchez
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 24-0719

    Court declined to dismiss §§1981 and 1982 claims where minority plaintiff alleged that she was followed and screamed at by store employees who admitted that she "didn't look like a customer" and looked like people who had recently committed thefts in the store. Defendant's motion to dismiss denied in part and granted in part.

  • Spivack v. City of Philadelphia

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law
    Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Freeman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-1212

    District court erred in granting summary judgment to district attorney and city in appellant's action challenging the denial of her request for a religious exemption from a COVID-19 vaccine mandate because a jury needed to determine whether the district attorney's office could have accommodated appellant or other similarly situated religious objectors. Vacated.

  • In re: Appeal of Bochetto & Lentz

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Public Records
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Dumas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1445 C.D. 2022

    The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office appealed from the trial court's order granting a requester's statutory appeal and ordering the production of records pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law. The court vacated and remanded for the trial court to issue a decision containing findings of fact, conclusions of law, and an articulated and reasoned basis for its disposition.

  • Commonwealth v. Couteret

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Leavitt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 413 C.D. 2021

    Trial court erred in convicting hunting guide for unlawful taking of game/wildlife and use of unlawful devices/methods where the record demonstrated that defendant happened to encounter game while lawfully traveling along a public road and passed on the location of that game to hunters he had a chance encounter with. Order of the trial court reversed.

  • Gross v. Mintz

    Publication Date: 2024-08-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1735 EDA 2023

    Trial court correctly dismissed protection from abuse petition based on evidence of alleged child abuse that had been litigated in a prior PFA petition and deemed unfounded by the court and law enforcement/child protection agencies. Order of the trial court affirmed.