Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Trial court abused discretion in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law on the validity of the parties' agreement to arbitrate following preliminary objections in the form of a petition to compel arbitration. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
Defendants moved for summary judgment in plaintiff teacher's fourteenth amendment pre-deprivation due process and malicious prosecution claims over his termination after he allegedly physically abused a student but the facts were in dispute as to whether he was advised of the specific allegations and the evidence in his meeting with defendants, the law was clear that he was entitled to a Loudermill hearing and the report defendants gave to prosecutor misrepresented facts. Motions denied.
Publication Date: 2018-07-24 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Ott Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0853
Appeal quashed as untimely where filed 31 days after judgment of sentence imposed. Appeal quashed.
The court awarded plaintiff's motion for a new trial as to damages for past medical expenses, lost profits, and pain and suffering, where the jury did not address any of those areas in its verdict.
Singer and singer's touring company failed to demonstrate lack of personal jurisdiction or failure to state a claim in plaintiff's action over the last minute cancellation of a concert and the failure to return deposit money because the complaint plainly alleged that touring company committed intentional torts and knew its conduct would harm plaintiff in Pennsylvania and plaintiff sufficiently pled the existence of an agency relationship to support plausible breach of contract and tort claims against singer as principal. Motions denie
Publication Date: 2018-07-24 Practice Area:Criminal Appeals Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0850
In considering whether the defendant provided valid consent to the search of an upstairs room of his home, the trial court erred in focusing exclusively on the officers' alleged violations of police directives where defendant had summoned police and verbally consented to the inspection of a second-floor room. The appellate court reversed and remanded.
Defendant's motion to quash plaintiff's third party subpoena to defendant's ISP seeking his true name and address in a copyright infringement action was denied because he lacked standing to object to the subpoena on undue burden grounds and first amendment protection did not extend to acts of copyright infringement. Motion denied.
Plaintiff's complaint failed to allege a viable claim for vicarious liability on the part of the defendant employer, who's employee allegedly struck and killed a victim while driving the company's car under the influence of alcohol, as none of the negligence allegations involved conduct committed during the course and scope of the driver's employment. The court granted employer's motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff's action against a property remediation company for conversion did not adequately allege the personal property at issue, so the court sustained a preliminary objection, but allowed plaintiff to amend. The gist of the action doctrine barred plaintiff's negligence claim.
Publication Date: 2018-07-24 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Strassburger Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0858
Involuntary termination of parental rights vacated where counsel appointed to advocate for children's legal interest failed to place the children's preferred outcomes on the record or make any argument or statement on their behalf, in violation of the children's statutory right to client-directed counsel in involuntary termination proceedings. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.