Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Clear and convincing evidence supported the involuntary termination of a father's parental rights where he was incarcerated and failed to make use of available resources to form and maintain a connection with the child.
Publication Date: 2018-07-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Bowes Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0827
Jury could convict for aggravated assault either by finding that bullet striking identified victim was meant for another unidentified person or that defendant caused serious bodily injury while engaging in reckless behavior by firing a weapon in public in the direction of other people. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-07-17 Practice Area:Tax Industry: Court:Commonwealth Court Judge:Judge Jubelirer Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0802
Imposition of tobacco tax upon e-cigarette products containing nicotine derived from sources other than tobacco did not violate substantive due process where rationally related to state objectives of defraying health costs of nicotine and tobacco use and discouraging consumption of such products. Application for summary relief denied in part and granted in part.
Publication Date: 2018-07-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Kunselman Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0829
Consent to blood alcohol test voluntary, despite defendant being provided with unconstitutional implied consent warnings, where defendant requested the blood draw prior to being provided warnings in the belief the results of a blood alcohol test would vindicate him. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-07-17 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Shogan Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0831
Trial court erred in refusing to appoint a separate guardian ad litem, in case where attorney was both child's attorney and GAL, because 16 year-old child and GAL had diametrically opposed positions on child's placement and the divergent opinions constituted a conflict. Reversed.
Publication Date: 2018-07-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Nichols Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0824
The lower court did not err in find that the conduct of troopers who prevented counsel from contacting defendant while he was being interrogated for a second time did not vitiate defendant's otherwise knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order denying defendant relief under the Post Conviction Relief Act.
Publication Date: 2018-07-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Panella Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0821
Defendant failed to establish that the commonwealth's Brady violation constituted intentional prosecutorial misconduct designed to deprive him of a fair trial where he produced no evidence of intent. The appellate court affirmed defendant's judgment of sentence.
Clear and convincing evidence indicated that a will was executed under undue influence and while the testator suffered from a weakened mental state. The court affirmed the order declaring the will invalid.
Publication Date: 2018-07-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0826
Traffic stop was based on reasonable suspicion where police used tracking application they had prior experience with to track stolen phone to location where only one vehicle and no individuals on foot were located. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
The defendant employer failed to demonstrate that it was entitled to summary relief in this age discrimination lawsuit where plaintiff established a prima facia case and cited evidence from which a factfinder could reasonable disbelieve defendant's proffered non-discriminatory reason for terminating plaintiff from his teaching position. The court denied in part defendant's motion for summary judgment.