Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Plaintiff's complaint failed to set forth a viable claim for breach of contract where the purported oral agreement calling for defendant to transfer title of a mobile home back to plaintiff upon the death of plaintiff's wife lacked the essential element of consideration. The court sustained defendant's preliminary objections.
The plaintiff property owner gave the former owners notice to vacate the property as a courtesy where they held over as occupants after the property was sold at a sheriff's sale, but plaintiff was under no obligation to do so and defendants failed to set forth any basis to defeat plaintiff's request for summary relief in this ejectment action. The court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
Issues of fact and credibility precluded summary judgment as to causation and habitability issues pertaining to an oil spill during the delivery of heating fuel to plaintiffs' home. However, the court granted summary judgment regarding damage to a water line and on the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim.
Publication Date: 2018-07-24 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Strassburger Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0857
Trial court erred by involuntarily terminating parental rights where it appointed counsel without expressly stating whether counsel would advocate for children's best interests or would serve children's statutory right to counsel representing their legal interests. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
Publication Date: 2018-07-24 Practice Area:Criminal Appeals Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Platt Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0851
The trial court did not err in denying defendant's challenge to the weight of the evidence where any alleged contradictory testimony supporting his criminal conviction, when viewed as a whole, was complimentary and any difference in testimony involved a minor discrepancy. The appellate court affirmed defendant's judgment of sentence.
The court denied a defendant's preliminary objection based on lack of personal jurisdiction, because the sheriff's return of service indicated that this defendant was timely served.
Publication Date: 2018-07-24 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Panella Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0852
The trial court erred in quashing a charge against defendant for carrying a concealed firearm in violation of 18 Pa.C.S. §6106 where the firearm at issue was tucked into defendant's waistband with just the handle visible and, thus, there was sufficient evidence of concealment. The appellate court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
The court denied a petition to open or strike the default judgment in this mortgage foreclosure matter, because the moving party failed to explain why he delayed more than 30 days in seeking relief, and he failed to attach an answer to his petition.
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment in plaintiff's action asserting retaliation for requesting an accommodation under the ADA because plaintiff could not establish a prima facie case where she was terminated for poor performance 33 months after her request for an accommodation was granted, her allegations of hostility were not backed up by any evidence and she was unable to show a "corporate culture" of retaliation. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2018-07-24 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Kunselman Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0864
Trial court erred in denying incarcerated mother's request for telephone contact with her daughter and in awarding sole legal custody to father because trial court's failure to notify mother of her right to request that she be present at the hearing via writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum was reversible error and trial court erroneously determined the extent of mother's "supervised physical custody" without proper consideration of all relevant factors. Order vacated.