By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | June 14, 2017
Timely Service of Notice of Claim on City Non-Waivable Condition Precedent to Suit
1 minute read
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | June 13, 2017
Probable Cause Existed to Arrest 2014 Protest's Documenters for Pedestrian Traffic Offenses
1 minute read
By Josefa Velasquez | June 13, 2017
Civil liberties advocates and lawmakers gathered at the Capitol Tuesday to urge legislators to pass a bill that would limit the use of solitary confinement in state prisons to 15 consecutive days and 20 days within a 60-day period before the end of the session next week.
1 minute read
By Vivia Chen, The Careerist | June 13, 2017
It is weirdly comforting that a big, strong guy like Comey is no better at handling a manipulative, slimy guy in power than we women are.
1 minute read
By P.J. D'Annunzio | June 13, 2017
A former Hershey Co. employee who claims she was denied transfer away from her ex-boyfriend and supervisor in an attempt to force her to resign can move forward with her lawsuit against the candymaker.
1 minute read
By newyorklawjournal | New York Law Journal | June 12, 2017
Challenge to Law's Interpretation as Requiring Sheriff's Deputy to Live in County Rejected
1 minute read
By Rebecca Baker | June 12, 2017
"This civil rights class action is the paradigm of change and progress achievable in a society undergirded by the rule of law," Southern District Judge Robert Sweet wrote in approving the settlement in a case that accused NYPD officers of writing at least 900,000 summonses that were later dismissed as insufficient.
1 minute read
By P.J. D'Annunzio | June 12, 2017
A former FedEx saleswoman's age discrimination case alleging she was targeted for termination because of her age and subsequently replaced with a younger employee will be decided at trial, a federal judge has ruled.
1 minute read
By Jesse J. Holland | June 12, 2017
When the Supreme Court decided the landmark case, only 3 percent of newlyweds were intermarried.
1 minute read
By Angela D. Giampolo | June 12, 2017
In the wake of Memorial Day weekend, I got to thinking about our LGBTQ members of the armed services. For 17 years, Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT) forcibly closeted tens of thousands of military service men and women. Originally designed as a compromise between lawmakers and military personnel who wanted the ban on LGBTQ service members lifted and those who didn't, the reality of DADT encouraged an environment where discrimination and prejudice festered, and those most hurt by it had no recourse because they faced dishonorable discharge. Over the lifespan of DADT, more than 14,000 service members were given discharges due to their sexual orientation. The Sept. 20, 2011, repeal of DADT, however, lifted that albatross from the necks of our LGBTQ service members, allowing them to live authentically both in and out of uniform. Now we have a military that accepts any qualified person willing to serve and with the daily reminder of the dangers at our country's doorstep, better late than never.
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The Antitrust Counsel is responsible for assisting the Director of the NAAG Center for Consumer Protection (Center) in developing and advanc...
At Carter Mario Law Firm, we foster a culture in which our employees are encouraged and supported to succeed. We provide continuous learning...
Personnel NoticeNotice Number Announcement Date108-24 06/11/2024Closing Date Command & Location7/11/2024 NAVSUP Philadelphia, PAGrade ...
