By Cheryl Miller | October 14, 2019
Over the last four weeks, culminating with Sunday night's bill-signing deadline, Newsom has approved numerous pieces of worker friendly legislation with potentially sweeping implications.
By P.J. D'Annunzio | October 14, 2019
The court said "relying on the County Ethics Code that merely encourages reporting wrongdoing is not enough to bring her reporting into the realm of her ordinary job duties."
By P.J. D'Annunzio | October 11, 2019
The plaintiff argued that the Port Authority's voluntary swap policy is not a reasonable accommodation because the Port Authority did not do anything to facilitate the swaps. "The record belies Miller's claims," the Third Circuit said.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Robert Storace | October 11, 2019
A partner and associate from the 102-lawyer firm will defend the suit by former associate athletic director Jacyln Piscitelli, who alleges Calhoun harassed her.
The Recorder | Analysis|Expert Opinion
By Seth Sproul and Tucker Terhufen | October 11, 2019
California trade secret law, through California Code of Civil Procedure §2019.210, presents a statutory framework unique among state and federal trade secret laws that requires trade secret plaintiffs to identify the misappropriated trade secrets before discovery commences. This article examines the genesis, purpose, and leading cases interpreting §2019.210.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Christian Petrucci | October 11, 2019
In what has become an interesting if somewhat inexplicable trend at the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, the court issued a nonprecedential (unreported) case.
By James P. Baker | October 11, 2019
A series of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions has established a legal sea change: class action lawsuits are no longer necessary.
By Cheryl Miller | October 11, 2019
Assembly Bill 51 blocks employers from requiring workers to pursue their claims privately as a condition of accepting a job or continuing employment.
By David Thomas | October 10, 2019
Mark Savignac and Julia Sheketoff doubled down on their argument that the firm's parental leave policy discriminates against fathers—and that Jones Day knows it.
By David Thomas | October 10, 2019
Mark Savignac and Julia Sheketoff doubled down on their argument that the firm's parental leave policy discriminates against fathers—and that Jones Day knows it.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
The County Counsel's Office is recruiting for a Litigation Attorney. These positions provide legal advice, assistance and representation in ...
Harter Secrest & Emery LLP is seeking a mid- to senior-level Employee Benefits attorney for the firm s Rochester, Buffalo or Albany offi...
***Location is in Edison, New Jersey*** We are a busy Central New Jersey Defense Firm specializing in Workers Compensation Law. We service...