Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
The court issued an opinion in support of its Feb. 15, 2024 order denying the City of Pittsburgh's statutory appeal and affirming the decision of an arbitration panel in an employee discipline matter.
Defendant home sellers sought summary judgment in buyers' action alleging misrepresentations regarding the property. The court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion, holding that plaintiffs alleged viable claims for fraud and violation of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract where plaintiffs claimed defendants failed to disclose known plans for an industrial limestone mine near the home that plaintiffs purchased. The court held that plaintiffs had n
Appellant appealed the district court's dismissal of its suit against New Jersey officials, which challenged the imposition of a partnership filing fee under the New Jersey Business Tax Reform Act.
The court filed a §1925(a) opinion in support of its order sustaining preliminary objections to improper venue and transferring the case to Northampton County.
Petitioner sought review of a final order affirming respondent's decision adopting an administrative law judge's adjudication that denied petitioner's request for an exception to the cap on in-home care hours he could receive from his family. The court affirmed, holding that petitioner failed to demonstrate a burden on his free exercise of religion where he could continue to receive available home care and companion services despite the fact that his mother and sister would no longer be paid for providing more than 60 hours of care pe
The court filed a § 1925(a) opinion in support of its order granting defendant's motion to transfer the venue of this slip and fall case to Montgomery County.
Publication Date: 2024-06-07 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Stabile Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 517 EDA 2023
Commonwealth appealed the trial court's order granting appellee's motion to dismiss pursuant to the prompt trial rule under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1013. The court reversed and remanded, holding that appellant did not delay appellee's prosecution on de novo appeal where it merely failed to correct its information to reflect reinstatement of a summary offense that it had voluntarily withdrawn before appellee's municipal court trial.
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's title VII, Americans with Disabilities Act, Pennsylvania Human Relations Act religious, pregnancy and disability discrimination action asserting failure to accommodate and wrongful termination and court found she failed to exhaust her administrative remedies as to the disparate impact, disability discrimination and unlawful interference claims but sufficiently established her religious discrimination and sex discrimination claims. Motion granted in part and denied in part.