Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
In this § 1925(a) opinion, the trial court urged that its March 4, 2024, order denying appellant's motion for bad faith and attorneys' fees and foregoing his bill of costs be affirmed because it was untimely and lacking in merit.
The court, after noting that it had been three years since the parents of S.M., who has severe autism and intellectual disabilities, had sued the school district seeking an appropriate residential educational placement, ordered the school district to secure and fund S.M.'s placement at Melmark School in Berwyn, Pa. immediately.
Where petition for review only challenged the denial of reconsideration but not the underlying order, appellant's focus on the underlying merits of the order and not the abuse of discretion in denying reconsideration was fatal to the appeal. Petition for review denied.
The court affirmed the determination of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying claimant's application for unemployment benefits because she voluntarily terminated her employment without a necessitous and compelling cause.
Defendant challenged the no-contact provision of her sentence for possession of controlled dangerous substances and endangering the welfare of her child and court found trial court had no power to impose the condition as part of a state sentence within the jurisdiction of the state correctional and parole authorities and the condition could not stand as any sort of bar to defendant's seeing her child. Parole condition vacated.
Disabled hunter sufficiently pled disability discrimination claim against state game commission by alleging that disabled-access trails were inadequate or inaccessible to mobility devices. Defendant's motion to dismiss denied.
Department of Transportation erred in refusing to allow inspection station to resume vehicle inspections after it submitted proof of new insurance coverage that the department ultimately deemed acceptable. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Respondent moved for post-trial relief and court granted judgment for possession and involuntary transfer of a car in favor of petitioner towing company. Motion denied.
Court denied request for back pay where plaintiff former employee only prevailed on failure to accommodate claim and jury expressly rejected claims that employer terminated plaintiff due to her disability or race. Plaintiff's motion to alter judgment denied.
Publication Date: 2024-10-25 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Supreme Court Judge:Justice Brobson Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 800 CAP
Court vacated PCRA court's determination where it made a cursory analysis of whether petitioner met the newly discovered facts exception to the PCRA time bar. Order of the PCRA court vacated, case remanded.