Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Appellant appealed the dismissal of his Post Conviction Relief Act petition after he was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder and related crimes. The court affirmed, holding that appellant failed to demonstrate intentional or reckless prosecutorial misconduct where the prosecutor in his case relied on a documentary exhibit to refresh a testifying police officer's memory regarding a fact later contradicted by other police officers.
Plaintiff and defendant filed cross-motions for summary judgment in plaintiff's action alleging equitable subrogation and related claims regarding the purchase and sale of a residence encumbered by a mortgage. The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant where plaintiff bought the property subject to defendant's prior mortgage and thus assumed primary responsibility for the mortgage to the extent of plaintiff's interest in the property.
Medical malpractice plaintiffs filed a motion in limine to exclude the testimony of certain defense expert witnesses. The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, holding that defendants' corporate liability expert witness would be prohibited from testifying that hospitals were inundated with COVID patients at the time a plaintiff was admitted where the pandemic was unrelated to the care involved in plaintiffs' case.
Insured was not entitled to business income or extra expense losses resulting from partial shutdowns in response to government orders during COVID pandemic as policies required physical alteration of the property. Order of the superior court reversed, case remanded.
Court lacked personal jurisdiction over company that allegedly misappropriated domestic business's materials and used them to compete in another state. Defendant's motion to dismiss granted.
Property owner was not entitled to nunc pro tunc relief where it had an opportunity to seek retroactive application of tax-exempt status by appealing the decision conferring such status. Order of the Commonwealth Court reversed, judgment of the trial court reinstated.
District court erred in interpreting agency liability under Delaware law, where a parent could incur agency liability for a subsidiary's wrongful acts post-acquisition.