Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Petitioner invoked the court's original jurisdiction to seek review of procedures adopted by respondent to administer its medical services program. The court dismissed the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction, holding that petitioner's action failed to identify a constitutional right or protected interest as required to invoke the court's original jurisdiction over prisoner due process claims.
Appellant appealed his conviction and sentence after pleading guilty to multiple charges, including Hobbs Act robberies, wire fraud, and aggravated identity theft.
Plaintiff petitioned for an interpretation of the phrase "financial net worth" as found in her prenuptial agreement with defendant. The court concluded that in the context of the parties' prenuptial agreement the phrase "financial net worth" meant the value of the parties' financial accounts and did not include defendant's real estate holdings and pension.
Trial court erred in ordering building demolition where there was no evidence of the building's interior or structural condition to support finding that it posed an imminent risk of collapse. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
Falling branch from tree whose base was outside commonwealth property or right-of-way was insufficient to trigger the real estate exception to sovereign immunity. Order of the trial court affirmed.
The court granted defendant's motion to compel individual arbitration of plaintiffs' claims alleging on behalf of a putative class that defendant shared sensitive patient health information with Google in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act under the Federal Arbitration Act and to stay the case pending the outcome of the individual proceedings.