Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
In this abuse of process matter, which plaintiffs filed following the dismissal of defendants federal anti-trust case, the court required defendants to produce certain documents under exceptions to the attorney-client privilege.
The court did not have specific personal jurisdiction over non-resident defendants under the states long arm statute where the motor vehicle accident occurred in another state, so it dismissed plaintiffs complaint.
Defendants were entitled to dismissal of plaintiff police officers action alleging violations of his first amendment rights, conspiracy and re-taliation by the solicitor and the borough when solicitor allegedly attempted to prevent him from running for the position of school director by encouraging others to challenge his nomination petition and allegedly influencing promotions in the police department because none of the events constituted materially adverse actions that hindered his campaign and his efforts to portray solicitor as
Trial court properly affirmed the zoning boards grant of a use variance to applicant because objector waived its argument as to applicants standing by not raising it before the board and the record supported the boards finding that applicant proved the required hardship. Affirmed.
Police officer had a reasonable suspicion to stop defendants vehicle, and defendant consented to a chemical blood test, so search warrants were not required. The court denied defendants motions to suppress.
Where purchasers of real property failed to respond to a request for admissions, defendant was entitled to summary judgment as to liability on his breach of contract claims, but not on the issue of damages. The court denied summary judgment on the unjust enrichment, negligence and equitable estoppel counterclaims.
Bank was entitled to dismissal of plaintiffs action alleging that bank negligently and in breach of contract allowed plaintiffs stepson to add his name to the bank account, change the mailing address on the account, deposit checks with forged endorsements and then remove the monies because the gist of the action and the economic loss doctrines barred the negligence counts and the breach of contract count was not sufficiently pled. Motion granted.
Trial court properly found that a 1902 tax sale conveyed the oil and gas rights to the property in their entirety under Herder Spring Hunting Club v. Keller, 143 A.3d 358, the 1902 tax sale effectuated a title wash and appellee established a prima facie evidence of the entry of the 1902 deed. Affirmed.
The trial court erred in concluding that plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of a decision in favor of defendant was not a post-trial motion for purposes of Pa.R.Civ.P. 227.1 and that he failed to preserve any issues for appellate review. The appellate court vacated and remanded.
Adverse possession claim could be brought against property of a political subdivision not held for public purpose or at the direction of the commonwealth in furtherance of the subdivisions constitutional obligations. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.