Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Motion to reinstate action following settlement denied where denial of intent to have entered into settlement based solely on written affidavit. Motion to reinstate action denied.
Court granted the police commissioners motion for judgment on the pleadings in plaintiffs action seeking the restoration of his private right to possess a firearm since the same issue had been litigated in plaintiffs favor in state court but court denied federal defendants 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss because plaintiff sufficiently stated a claim. Granted in part and denied in part.
The court followed the majority of other states in concluding that attorney fees were not available as consequential damages under the Uniform Commercial Code.
Publication Date: 2018-03-27 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Olson Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0323
PCRA court had subject matter jurisdiction to hear a subsequent PCRA petition so long as a prior PCRA petition was not pending on appeal or subject to further appellate review. Order of the PCRA court affirmed.
Motion to disqualify expert for conflict of interest denied where movant failed to identify information movant shared with expert prior to governments investigation and retention of expert. Motion to disqualify expert denied.
When viewed in a light most favorable to the City of Philadelphia as plaintiff, the City produced facts sufficient to proceed with its claim against the U.S. Attorney General for alleged violations of the Administrative Procedure Act in this suit challenging the imposition of immigration-related funding conditions. The court denied defendants motion to dismiss.
The plaintiff property owners trespass claims against their neighbor survived a motion for summary judgment where the record presented sufficient evidence to demonstrate that pipes placed on the property of defendants predecessor resulted in the discharge of sewage onto plaintiffs property. The court denied defendants motion for summary judgment.
Unemployment compensation board erred in calculating claimants net income from her sideline business because 34 Pa. Code §65.121 was unreasonable and ignored prior court rulings concerning the definition of net earnings. Reversed.
Defendants could not rely on a clause in a contract they did not sign to compel arbitration where it was not clear from the record whether they were acting as agents of a signatory to that contract in an alleged health care billing fraud scheme. The court denied defendants motion to compel arbitration.