Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Trial court authorized to impose civil contempt for partys violation of separation order, regardless of whether such order was incorporated into the divorce decree. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Insurer was entitled to summary judgment where plaintiff was unable to show that an exception applied to the policys exclusion for certain types of water damage.
Publication Date: 2018-04-03 Practice Area:Family Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0380
Trial court erred in granting husbands petition to decrease his alimony obligation because husbands stated desire to retire at some point in the future did not constitute a substantial and continuing change in circumstances that warranted a downward modification of alimony and husband failed to show that his alleged poor health had affected his financial circumstances or his ability to work. Order vacated.
Insurers motion to dismiss plaintiff insureds declaratory judgment action seeking coverage for suit brought by regenerative medicine company was granted because the suit was not covered under the policys libel and slander provision and the policys intellectual property exclusion excluded coverage. Motion granted.
While plaintiffs could not locate the original plan of lots upon which they relied to establish a right of way over a disputed road, their pleading satisfied the requirements of Pa.R.Civ.P. 1019(i), which contemplates the inability of a party to attach a writing to a complaint and provides alternative pleading measures. The court overruled defendants preliminary objections to plaintiffs complaint.
Landlord did not breach lease by declaring tenant in default, where lease terms explicitly defined default as tenants vacating of premises and tenant had physically moved out of space. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment, because factual issues existed regarding whether plaintiffs harm constituted an occupational illness, and whether defendants fraudulently concealed knowledge relating to this type of harm and its causes.
Publication Date: 2018-04-03 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Kunselman Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 18-0383
Where defendant was incarcerated prior to the disposition of new charges against him and he failed to satisfy bail at the time of his arrest on the new charges, the trial court was required to credit him with the time served prior to the disposition of new charges against his new sentence. The appellate court vacated defendants judgment of sentence and remanded.
A school district did not waive any arguments by relying on the record and electing not to appear before the Board of Revision of Taxes, and the district exhausted its administrative remedies.
Court granted defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims of misappropriation of trade secrets under PUTSA and DTSA and tortious in-terference with business relationships, in plaintiffs action over start-up hiring plaintiffs employees, because plaintiff failed to identify the alleged trade secrets, failed to show that defendants acquired or used any trade secrets and the employees employment contracts did not restrict their post-termination employment. Motion granted.