Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Claimant who mistakenly applied for wrong unemployment compensation program in good faith nonetheless remained obligated to repay improperly received benefits. Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed.
The court remanded for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, holding that the reading of appellant's co-defendant's entire and unredacted criminal information was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent that plea allocutions and confessions are testimonial.
Trial court erred in ruling on validity of regional water authority's sale agreement and the municipality's assumption of obligations on remand where the remand order merely directed the trial court to enter mandamus relief for the municipality. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Defendant commercial vehicle liability insurer appealed the trial court's orders granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and denying its summary judgment motion. The court affirmed, holding that plaintiff, as owner of an insured trucking company, was an "insured" under defendant's policy entitled to receive stacked underinsured motorist coverage under Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.
Defendants filed preliminary objections to plaintiffs' complaint alleging negligence that resulted in sexual abuse of a child. The court sustained defendant First Judicial District's preliminary objections and overruled those of defendant City of Philadelphia. The court held that defendant FJD fell outside the Sovereign Immunity Act's waiver of sovereign immunity because it was not a Commonwealth agency encompassed by the waiver. The court held that defendant City did not enjoy sovereign immunity because plaintiffs' case fell within t
Trial court erred in dismissing appellant's appeal of summary convictions for violations of 34 Pa. Code §§403.62 and 403.81 based on a failure to appear because court could not conclude that the procedural safeguards set forth in the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure were applied and that appellant had notice of the hearing. Vacated.
The court granted in part and denied in part plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927, Local Civil Rule 83.6.1(b), and the court's inherent authority against Rosen Law LLC and its client, defendant Papers Unlimited.
Defendant airline moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint for failure to state a claim. The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, holding that plaintiffs stated claims for breach of contract and false light invasion of privacy where they alleged that defendant's personnel failed to assist them in finding overnight accommodations after escorting them off a fully-boarded flight against their will and without any justification.
The court struck the conditions for documentation of ownership and payment of a fee, sustaining two objections of appellants who challenged appellee's granting their conditional use application for the construction and operation of a solar farm.