Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation claims against media outlets failed where news articles did not mention plaintiff or state inaccurate information about him. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted.
The court granted the Pennsylvania Human Relation Commission's motion to intervene as a defendant in defendant Boddie's complaint that plaintiff's Uber's background check policy was racially discriminatory. The court dismissed plaintiff's motion to compel arbitration that sought to enforce an arbitration agreement to halt an investigation by the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission which sought to re-open an old investigation into Uber as a means of avoiding the statute of limitations.
Third-party news organization moved to intervene in plaintiff's wrongful death action and to unseal settlement documents that had been filed under seal. The court denied the motion, holding that the documents should remain sealed where they contained purely financial settlement information that could intensify existing risks of harassment and potential harm to plaintiff and his young child.
Publication Date: 2024-09-20 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Panella Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 765 WDA 2023
Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence on his convictions for possession with intent to deliver and other narcotics crimes. The court affirmed, holding that appellant failed to demonstrate sentencing error where the trial court imposed guideline sentencing after a hearing in which appellant's counsel emphasized mitigating evidence regarding appellant's background and rehabilitation.
The court ruled on defendant's motion to compel discovery and request to determine sufficiency of admissions by granting the motion in part and denying it in part.
The court denied defendant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, granted his motion for disclosure of criminal charges, promises of leniency and/or immunity, and conditionally granted his motion to reserve the right to file additional motions for discovery based on information or discovery provided after the motions hearing.
The court denied defendant's omnibus pretrial motion which included a request for discovery and inspection of evidence as well as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in all respects and ruled that the case would remain on the March 2024 criminal jury trial term.