Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
The court sustained in part the objection filed by defendant Architectural Design Consultants, Inc. to plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint and add a party, Carlisle Construction, based upon deposition testimony of employees of Carlisle Roofing Systems.
Petitioners appealed a decision of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board holding that an employer was not entitled to a pension offset credit where a previously retired employee received workers' compensation wage loss benefits for a work-related injury that occurred after his return to part-time employment with the same employer. The court affirmed, holding that the Workers' Compensation Act's pension offset is not available where a compensable injury occurs within the context of a retiree's subsequent, part-time employment with a
Publication Date: 2024-08-30 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Dubow Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 668 MDA 2023
Trial court correctly rejected appellant's effort to introduce character witness testimony that was limited to specific conduct, which constituted inadmissible habit evidence. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Applicant demonstrated reasonable efforts to acquire liquor license under county quota scheme by contacting license holders and making purchase offer within its financial means to the sole party who responded with interest, as Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board regulations did not require a fair market offer if applicant's financial means could not support it. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Claimant who mistakenly applied for wrong unemployment compensation program in good faith nonetheless remained obligated to repay improperly received benefits. Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed.
The court remanded for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, holding that the reading of appellant's co-defendant's entire and unredacted criminal information was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent that plea allocutions and confessions are testimonial.
Trial court erred in ruling on validity of regional water authority's sale agreement and the municipality's assumption of obligations on remand where the remand order merely directed the trial court to enter mandamus relief for the municipality. Order of the trial court affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Defendant commercial vehicle liability insurer appealed the trial court's orders granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff and denying its summary judgment motion. The court affirmed, holding that plaintiff, as owner of an insured trucking company, was an "insured" under defendant's policy entitled to receive stacked underinsured motorist coverage under Pennsylvania's Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.