Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2024-09-06 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Commonwealth Court Judge:Judge Wojcik Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 1440 C.D. 2021
Where appellant did not admit to providing an insufficient breath sample and there was no evidence regarding the breath test from the administering officer, the trial court erred in concluding that appellant had refused breath testing. Order of the trial court vacated and remanded.
Trial court properly awarded counsel fees to appellee after appellants' confession of judgment complaint was dismissed because appellants lacked a sufficient basis in law or fact to commence the action and the sole purpose of the action was to cause annoyance to appellee. Affirmed.
Employer petitioned for review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board affirming in part and reversing in part the order of a Workers' Compensation Judge that granted employee's claim petition. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings, holding that the WCJ's findings that a claimant suffered knee and lower back injuries were not adequately reasoned where the injury descriptions were too general and vague to permit effective review.
The court denied defendants preliminary objections to plaintiff's complaint alleging that his late mother died because defendants failed to provide her with competent home health care.
Trial court abused its discretion in imposing a de minimis fine in response to a landlord's failure to remediate serious fire code violations for over two years. Order of the trial court reversed.
Multidistrict litigation court erred in ruling that plaintiff's failure-to-warn claim was not preempted under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act because neither issue preclusion nor administrative law provided a basis to affirm, the preapproval regulation prohibited modifying health warnings on a pesticide's preapproved label and the parallel requirements test was not satisfied when the Pennsylvania duty to warn and the federal comparator were compared. Reversed.
The court reversed the Commonwealth Court and remanded for reinstatement of the trial court's order dismissing the condemnation action where appellants proved that the public was not the "primary and paramount beneficiary" of the taking.
Plaintiff property owners appealed the trial court's order denying their request for injunctive and declaratory relief in their action challenging their homeowners' association's restrictions on short-term rentals. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions for entry of a declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiffs that the association's bylaw amendment restricting short-term rentals was void and unenforceable.
Appellant appealed the denial of his application for disability pension benefits. The court held that where a city police pension plan ordinance did not expressly require the unanimous agreement of examining physicians as to the nature of an applicant's disability, a disabled municipal police officer met his burden of proof in support of his application for disability pension benefits where a majority of examining physicians concluded that he was disabled on some basis.