The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | May 23, 2019
A Coca-Cola employee should not have had his workers' compensation benefits suspended for the period of time he spent in pretrial incarceration, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Samuel H. Pond | May 23, 2019
More than a century after the workers' compensation system was implemented, it is becoming more evident that those suffering from job-related diseases are often left out, with no path to justice.
By Mike Scarcella | May 23, 2019
Welcome to Labor of Law, our weekly roundup of news and analysis for L&E practice teams.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | May 22, 2019
The Commonwealth Court has upheld an arbitrator's decision to reinstate Bloomsburg University assistant professor John Barrett, who was fired for having sexual relationships with two of his former students.
Daily Business Review | Commentary
By Jennifer Recine | May 22, 2019
Farms across the United States use seasonal foreign workers to harvest crops and often turn to recruiters—who are notorious for charging foreign workers extortionate fees to secure them jobs in this country.
By Patrick Smith | May 21, 2019
Can the class-action dynamo break Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey's four-decade streak in Congress?
By Rose Walker | May 21, 2019
Mansell is set to face the SDT hearing June 3.
By Charles Toutant | May 20, 2019
Appellate Division Judges ordered a discrimination lawsuit against Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa remanded to the Law Division for trial on the grounds that retired Superior Court Judge Nelson Johnson ignored its prior ruling when he dismissed the case in 2016.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Stephen M. Kramarsky | May 20, 2019
In his Intellectual Property column, Stephen M. Kramarsky discusses a recent SDNY decision involving unlawful access to electronically stored information, which can give rise to both state and federal claims for “hacking.” The employee in the case asserted those claims in both state and federal court. The doctrine of abstention provides federal courts a framework for exercising their discretion to abstain from adjudicating a matter, leaving it instead to the state court. However, in this case, SDNY declined to do so. Its opinion explains the bounds of the doctrine in this area, where the protections of state and federal law overlap.
By Xiumei Dong | May 17, 2019
Littler Mendelson has welcomed back trade secrets lawyer Mark Romeo in Orange County.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
***Location is in Edison, New Jersey*** We are a busy Central New Jersey Defense Firm specializing in Workers Compensation Law. We service...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have one to two years of employee benefits experie...